Legal Practitioner, John Oloyede, has faulted the Federal Government’s idea of setting up a committee to investigate issues surrounding the suspension of the Secretary to the Federal Government, Babachir Lawal and the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency, Ayo Oke.
He said in Nigeria, committees are set up to cover up lies. “There is a lie and you need a bigger lie to cover it up”.
“Why should the Vice President be heading a committee to investigate an allegation of crime against two individuals.
Dead On Arrival
“Secondly, the Attorney General and even the Presidency authored a response to the allegations by the Senate, giving the Secretary to the Government of the Federation a clean bill of health previously.
“The clean bill of health was on the bases of a report that was submitted by the Attorney General of the Federation. You now set up a committee; that committee is dead on arrival.
“If you suspect that there is some proof that something untoward has been done and is an infraction of the law, the proper procedure is not to set up a committee that is dead on arrival.”
The lawyer was therefore stated that the President should have taken a different step, rather than setting up a committee headed by the Vice President.
Let EFCC Investigate
“In Nigeria, you set up institutions and decapitate the institutions,” he said, while also noting that “what Professor Sani said, is playing out. You do not move two different sets of rules to fight corruption.
“If there is an allegation of crime against somebody, first and foremost, where did the first report come from? Now that it has become apparent to you (Mr President), that there is a problem with this particular person or persons, aren’t there institutions that are presently fighting the war on corruption? The EFCC, DSS, Police? He questioned.
“That administrative step should not be in public domain, it is not our business,” Oloyede added.
According to him, “the important thing now is that once a person is suspended, the EFCC should do their work.
“Let them investigate this person, just like they are investigating and charging other people to court. Why have two sets of rules for the same kind of crimes.
He holds the belief that since the AGF had absolved the SGF before, he could easily do same this time around as he would not want to double speak. However, if he does otherwise, then his previous report would be questioned.
“If he says this man is guilty as charged, then we’ll say where did you get your false report before, why didn’t you do a thorough investigation? The chief law officer, involved in double speak, that is untoward,” he asserted.